Monique Pressley reached prominence that is public an appropriate analyst, governmental commentator and finally whilst the lawyer for Bill Cosby as he was at the midst of their intimate assault instance. Now a couple of years later on, the lawyer happens to be suspended indefinitely as a result of claims that she misused customers’ funds.
Based on DailyMail.com, Pressley would allegedly need upfront payments from customers after which she’d cash the amount of money and deposit the funds into individual accounts, in accordance with appropriate papers.
The self-described Democratic strategist, whom defended Cosby after which would later on stop their group in 2016, ended up being suspended from exercising legislation in Washington D.C. Back August 2019. The suspension system ended up being “based on impairment” and ended up being determined after per month of research from the disciplinary counsel, whom stated they delivered “ clear and convicting evidence” of her misconduct and proposed that she be disbarred.
Three of Pressley’s previous clients accused her of using retainers and quickly withdrawing the funds for individual usage without doing significant work. The complaint that is first Pressley ended up being from Edwin and Paula Amaker, a few Pressley along with her spouse Carlton knew from church where they both acted as elder people.
Back 2013, Paula hired Pressley to represent her in a claim against her ex-business partner september. She decided to offer Pressley a payment that is advanced of5,000 as well as a per hour price of $425, based on appropriate documents. Pressley told Paula she would definitely contain the $5,000 within an escrow account and withdraw the amount of money as she obtained it. Nevertheless, based on the documents that are legal Pressley didn’t have trust account at that time over time. The papers state that Pressley cashed the $5,000 an after receiving the check day.
After focusing on the truth for the following 8 weeks, Pressley told Paula that the way it is would probably visit test and she offered her the choice to pay for a set charge of $3,000 to perform the truth, in place of doing work for a rate that is hourly. Paula consented and Pressley straight away cashed the check.
Then in October 2014, over per year after employing Pressley, Paul stated she felt “more and much more upset and hopeless because she wasn’t seeing any outcomes or proof work being done, ” according to papers that are legal. Paula’s spouse Edwin Amaker had to even talk to Pressley’s spouse Carlton, who stated he had been planning to manage the scenario despite the fact that he wasn’t an attorney.
“For almost 2 yrs, between October 2014 and September 2016, Pressley didn’t have interaction with Paula, ” the legal docs look over. After Carlton “took over” the instance, “Mr. Pressley proceeded to guide Mrs. Amaker to trust that her situation had been progressing. ”
In October 2016 once the Amakers sat straight straight down with Pressley to share with you the drawn out instance, Pressley presumably told them that should they desired to continue, they might need certainly to “pay thousands of bucks for extra costs. ”
An additional February 2015 problem, Pressley decided to express Billy Greer in their sex and www.essayshark.ws age discrimination lawsuit. Relating to docs that are legal she charged Greer “a price of $350 each hour and asked he spend $2,400 beforehand to litigate the truth through the movement to dismiss. ” In the beginning, Greer tried to spend Pressley via a cashier’s check but she stated she just would just simply take money. The appropriate documents state she “drove around the part to a bank that is nearby’ making Greer get in to cash the check. He gone back to her vehicle and handed her the $2,400 in money. Pressley then deposited the total amount into her husband’s overdrawn company account, restoring the total amount to $2,054.74, relating to papers.
The account dipped down to $121, as the money was spent on “gas, food, cash withdrawals, and other day-to-day expenses, ” the legal papers say in just two weeks. During this time period, court papers state Pressley “had done no focus on the scenario apart from ending up in Mr. Greer and going to the five-minute status seminar. ”
In April, Pressley stated the $2,400 was “exhausted” and she’d need an extra $7,500 predetermined fee to complete the rest of this situation, otherwise she could be done representing Greer, in accordance with appropriate docs. Greer reluctantly paid and also the cash, once more, went along to the company account of Pressley’s spouse.
Whenever Greer’s situation had been dismissed in August, he learned that Pressley had fallen brief inside her representation, which caused the court to dismiss his suit, in line with the papers.
Into the 3rd and final listed grievance, Pressley had been employed by Randal and Tara Landers in March 2017 to research the scenario of the son’s death that is suspicious to relay their issues towards the U.S. Navy. They consented to spend Pressley $15,000 in advanced level charges also to provide her a rate that is hourly of625, in accordance with appropriate docs.
They wired the $15,000 to Pressley’s escrow account after signing documents. The account had an overdrawn stability of -$407, based on documents, in addition to money that is new it to $14,588.01. Pressley had applied for almost all the cash by transfer or money withdrawal significantly less than a later week. The account had a negative ending balance of –$549.99, say legal papers in two weeks.
3 months later on in Pressley texted Randal requesting they discuss his budget moving forward with the case june. But, Randal expanded worried that Pressley spent their $15,000 without doing any work so he requested an invoice regarding the hours she had worked. Whenever she didn’t offer any papers, Randal terminated their business model. He requested Pressley get back the remaining of this $15,000 retainer “given how little she had achieved on his instance” and considering she just “acknowledged 10 hours of benefit June. ” Randal has yet to get their reimbursement from Pressley, state appropriate papers.
“He received absolutely absolutely nothing of value for the $15,000, that he paid utilizing section of their son’s death benefit, ” say the papers.
Despite being offered by having a “specification of fees” back July 2018 and once again in October 2018, Pressley neglected to register answer that is“an fees brought against her despite being provided a few possibilities to do this. ” She additionally never ever appeared at hearings and in accordance with the papers, “She engaged in a pattern of dilatory tactics at every action associated with the procedure. ”